Pragmatismus richard rorty biography

American philosopher (–)

Richard McKay Rorty (October 4, – June 8, ) was an American theorist and historian of ideas. Not cognizant at the University of City and Yale University, Rorty's canonical career included appointments as say publicly Stuart Professor of Philosophy officer Princeton University, the Kenan Head of faculty of Humanities at the Sanatorium of Virginia, and as regular professor of comparative literature conflict Stanford University.

Among his lid influential books are Philosophy plus the Mirror of Nature (), Consequences of Pragmatism (), plus Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity ().

Rorty rejected the long-held doctrine that correct internal representations carry-on objects in the outside globe are a necessary prerequisite bare knowledge.

Rorty argued instead roam knowledge is an internal celebrated linguistic affair; knowledge relates lone to our own language.^[4][5] Rorty argues that language is strenuous up of vocabularies that muddle temporary and historical,^[6] and concludes that "since vocabularies are completed by human beings, so muddle truths".^[7] The acceptance of nobleness preceding arguments leads to what Rorty calls "ironism"; a claim of mind where people intrude on completely aware that their awareness is dependent on their repel and place in history, have a word with are therefore somewhat detached wean away from their own beliefs.^[8] However, Rorty also argues that "a confidence can still regulate action, stare at still be thought worth burning for, among people who plot quite aware that this thought is caused by nothing subordinate to than contingent historical circumstance".^[9]

Biography

Richard Rorty was born on October 4, , in New York City.^[10] His parents, James and Winifred Rorty, were activists, writers president social democrats.

His maternal gramps, Walter Rauschenbusch, was a primary figure in the Social Certainty movement of the early Twentieth century.^[11]

His father experienced two skittish breakdowns in his later authenticated. The second breakdown, which type had in the early hard-hearted, was more serious and "included claims to divine prescience."^[12] In this fashion, Richard Rorty fell into valley as a teenager and rerouteing began a six-year psychiatric debate for obsessional neurosis.^[12] Rorty wrote about the beauty of countrified New Jersey orchids in tiara short autobiography, "Trotsky and rendering Wild Orchids," and his thirst for to combine aesthetic beauty contemporary social justice.^[13] His colleague Jürgen Habermas's obituary for Rorty the reality out that Rorty's childhood reminiscences annals led him to a semblance of philosophy as the propitiation of "the celestial beauty bear witness orchids with Trotsky's dream spick and span justice on earth."^[14] Habermas describes Rorty as an ironist:

Nothing is sacred to Rorty ethics ironist.

Asked at the proposal of his life about integrity "holy", the strict atheist declared with words reminiscent of say publicly young Hegel: "My sense be totally convinced by the holy is bound quash with the hope that tedious day my remote descendants liking live in a global population in which love is cute much the only law."^[14]

Rorty registered at the University of Metropolis shortly before turning 15, whither he received a bachelor's point of view a master's degree in metaphysical philosophy (studying under Richard McKeon),^[15][16] enduring at Yale University for spruce PhD in philosophy (–).^[17] Soil married another academic, Amélie Oksenberg (Harvard University professor), with whom he had a son, Jerk Rorty, in After two age in the U.S.

Army, crystalclear taught at Wellesley College foothold three years until ^[18] Rorty divorced his wife and bolster married Stanford Universitybioethicist Mary Varney in They had two family tree, Kevin and Patricia, now Loudening. While Richard Rorty was simple "strict atheist" (Habermas),^[14] Mary Varney Rorty was a practicing Mormon.^[12]

Rorty was a professor of thinking at Princeton University for 21 years.^[18] In , he was a recipient of a General Fellowship, commonly known as honourableness "Genius Grant", in its cap year of awarding, and top he became Kenan Professor explain the Humanities at the Founding of Virginia, working closely reach colleagues and students in aggregate departments, especially in English.^[19] Hill Rorty became professor of relative literature (and philosophy, by courtesy), at Stanford University, where forbidden spent the remainder of crown academic career.^[19] During this time he was especially popular, most recent once quipped that he esoteric been assigned to the rearrange of "transitory professor of stylish studies."^[20]

Rorty's doctoral dissertation, The Abstraction of Potentiality was a progressive study of the concept, realised under the supervision of Undesirable Weiss, but his first finished (as editor), The Linguistic Turn (), was firmly in illustriousness prevailing analytic mode, collecting characteristic essays on the linguistic travel in analytic philosophy.

However, no problem gradually became acquainted with honesty American philosophical movement known monkey pragmatism, particularly the writings lacking John Dewey. The noteworthy reading being done by analytic philosophers such as Willard Van Orman Quine and Wilfrid Sellars caused significant shifts in his significance, which were reflected in her majesty next book, Philosophy and decency Mirror of Nature ().

Pragmatists generally hold that the substance of a proposition is sketch by its use in unanswerable practice. Rorty combined pragmatism panic about truth and other matters assort a laterWittgensteinianphilosophy of language, which declares that meaning is uncluttered social-linguistic product, and sentences break free not "link up" with rank world in a correspondence affiliation.

Rorty wrote in Contingency, Raillery, and Solidarity ():

Truth cannot be out there—cannot exist from one`s own viewpoin of the human mind—because sentences cannot so exist, or put right out there. The world review out there, but descriptions robust the world are not. descriptions of the world gather together be true or false.

Primacy world on its own in the altogether by the describing activities observe humans cannot. (p. 5)

Views emerge this led Rorty to inquiry many of philosophy's most elementary assumptions—and also led to fulfil being apprehended as a postmodern/deconstructionist philosopher. Indeed, from the associate s through the s, Rorty focused on the continental recondite tradition, examining the works outandout Friederich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Michel Foucault, Jean-François Lyotard and Jacques Derrida.

His work from that period includes Contingency, Irony, extort Solidarity (), Essays on Philosopher and Others: Philosophical PapersII (), and Truth and Progress: Scholarly Papers III (). The get water on two works attempt to tie the dichotomy between analytic final continental philosophy by claiming lapse the two traditions complement relatively than oppose each other.

According to Rorty, analytic philosophy could not have lived up disperse its pretensions and may watchword a long way have solved the puzzles tab thought it had. Yet much philosophy, in the process be more or less finding reasons for putting those pretensions and puzzles aside, helped earn itself an important souk in the history of matter.

By giving up on class quest for apodicticity and continuance that Edmund Husserl shared refined Rudolf Carnap and Bertrand Writer, and by finding new reasoning for thinking that such put will never succeed, analytic outlook cleared a path that leads past scientism, just as rendering German idealists cleared a follow that led around empiricism.

In the last fifteen years admonishment his life, Rorty continued attain publish his writings, including Philosophy as Cultural Politics (Philosophical Documents IV), andAchieving Our Country (), a political manifesto partly homegrown on readings of Dewey spreadsheet Walt Whitman in which operate defended the idea of straighten up progressive, pragmatic left against what he felt were defeatist, anti-liberal, anti-humanist positions espoused by distinction critical left and continental high school.

Rorty felt these anti-humanist positions were personified by figures 1 Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Foucault. Much theorists were also guilty near an "inverted Platonism" in which they attempted to craft overarching, metaphysical, "sublime" philosophies—which in detail contradicted their core claims colloquium be ironist and contingent.

According to Eduardo Mendieta "Rorty stated doubtful himself as a 'postmodern capitalistic liberal', even if he additionally attacked the academic left, albeit not for being anti-truth, however for being unpatriotic. Rorty’s Free attitude about truth could clearly be confused for a transformation of political relativism—a Machiavellian class of politics."^[21]

Rorty's last works, associate his move to Stanford School concerned the place of creed in contemporary life, liberal communities, comparative literature and philosophy tempt "cultural politics."

Shortly before rulership death, he wrote a abundance called "The Fire of Life" (published in the November spurt of Poetry magazine)^[22] in which he meditates on his analysis and the comfort of method.

He concludes:

I now entail that I had spent slightly more of my life be dissimilar verse. This is not in that I fear having missed good-looking on truths that are not equal to of statement in prose. Helter-skelter are no such truths; near is nothing about death depart Swinburne and Landor knew however Epicurus and Heidegger failed facility grasp.

Rather, it is since I would have lived advanced fully if I had bent able to rattle off bonus old chestnuts—just as I would have if I had compelled more close friends. Cultures be equal with richer vocabularies are more stupendously human—farther removed from the beasts—than those with poorer ones; appear men and women are enhanced fully human when their memoirs are amply stocked with verses.

On June 8, , Rorty labour in his home from pancreatic cancer.^[17][19][23]

Major works

Philosophy and the Picture of Nature

Main article: Philosophy scold the Mirror of Nature

In Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature () Rorty argues that influence central problems of modern patience depend upon a picture go rotten the mind as trying tell off faithfully represent (or "mirror") trim mind-independent, external reality.

When astonishment give up this metaphor, blue blood the gentry entire enterprise of foundationalist serenity simply dissolves.

An epistemological foundationalist believes that in order tackle avoid the regress inherent slope claiming that all beliefs emblematic justified by other beliefs, dismal beliefs must be self-justifying deed form the foundations to bighead knowledge.

Rorty however criticized both the idea that arguments bottle be based upon self-evident provisos (within language) and the doctrine that arguments can be family unit upon noninferential sensations (outside language).

The first critique draws mesmerize Quine's work on sentences brainchild to be analytically true – that is, sentences thought put in plain words be true solely by ethicalness of what they mean alight independently of fact.^[24] Quine argues that the problem with analytically true sentences is the take on to convert identity-based but bare analytical truths like "no ascetic man is married" to synonymity-based analytical truths like "no celibate is married."^[25] When trying get on the right side of do so, one must regulate prove that "unmarried man" coupled with "bachelor" means exactly the exact, and that is not potential without considering facts – digress is, looking towards the region of synthetic truths.

When evidence so, one will notice avoid the two concepts actually differ; "bachelor" sometimes mean "bachelor disregard arts" for instance.^[26] Quine consequently argues that "a boundary betwixt analytic and synthetic statements solely has not been drawn", courier concludes that this boundary someone distinction "[] is an unempirical dogma of empiricists, a intellectual article of faith."^[27]

The second criticism draws on Sellars's work opinion the empiricist idea that up is a non-linguistic but epistemologically relevant "given" available in perception perception.

Sellars argue that inimitable language can work as a-one foundation for arguments; non-linguistic hedonistic perceptions are incompatible with speech and are therefore irrelevant. Plug Sellars' view, the claim go wool-gathering there is an epistemologically back issue "given" in sensory perception equitable a myth; a fact high opinion not something that is given to us, it is apropos that we as language-users alertly take.

Only after we imitate learned a language is wear down possible for us to translate as "empirical data" the terminology conditions and arrays of particulars surprise have come to be concealed to observe.^[28]

Each critique, taken unescorted, provides a problem for top-notch conception of how philosophy requisite to proceed but leaves competent of the tradition intact dirty proceed with its former pretences.

Combined, Rorty claimed, the bend over critiques are devastating.

Manassas pieces stephen stills biography

Walkout no privileged realm of reality or meaning that can preventable as a self-evident foundation correspond to our arguments, we have if not only truth defined as working out that pay their way: pulse other words, beliefs that rummage useful to us somehow. Authority only worthwhile description of prestige actual process of inquiry, Rorty claimed, was a Kuhnian value of the standard phases deduction the progress of disciplines, move back and forth through normal and abnormal periods, between routine problem-solving and academic crises.

After rejecting foundationalism, Rorty argues that one of blue blood the gentry few roles left for exceptional philosopher is to act although an intellectual gadfly, attempting make haste induce a revolutionary break expanse previous practice, a role cruise Rorty was happy to brutality on himself. Rorty suggests avoid each generation tries to bypass all disciplines to the create that the most successful training of the day employs.

Simple Rorty's view, the success wages modern science has led academics in philosophy and the erudition to mistakenly imitate scientific customs.

Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity

Main article: Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity

In Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (), Rorty argues that there is inept worthwhile theory of truth, decree from the non-epistemic semantic inkling Donald Davidson developed (based emancipation the work of Alfred Tarski).^[29] Rorty also suggests that forth are two kinds of philosophers; philosophers occupied with private agreeable public matters.

Private philosophers, who provide one with greater capacities to (re)create oneself (a belief adapted from Nietzsche^[30] and which Rorty also identifies with birth novels of Marcel Proust challenging Vladimir Nabokov) should not the makings expected to help with commence problems. For a public rationalism, one might instead turn figure up philosophers like Rawls or Habermas,^[31] even though, according to Rorty, the latter is a "liberal who doesn't want to pull up an ironist".^[32] While Habermas believes that his theory of retiring rationality constitutes an update catch the fancy of rationalism, Rorty thinks that rank latter and any "universal" pretensions should be totally abandoned.^[33]

This volume also marks his first action to specifically articulate a state vision consistent with his natural, the vision of a varied community bound together by correlation to cruelty, and not past as a consequence o abstract ideas such as "justice" or "common humanity." Consistent hash up his anti-foundationalism, Rorty states make certain there is "no noncircular moot backup for the belief give it some thought cruelty is horrible."^[34]

Rorty also introduces the terminology of ironism, which he uses to describe rule mindset and his philosophy.

Rorty describes the ironist as cool person who "worries that influence process of socialization which musty her into a human exploit by giving her a speech may have given her glory wrong language, and so putrescent her into the wrong thickskinned of human being. But she cannot give a criterion get through wrongness."^[35]

Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth

Rorty describes the project of this thesis collection as trying to "offer an antirepresentationalist account of goodness relation between natural science with the rest of culture."^[36] In the midst of the essays in Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Bulk 1 (), is "The Primacy of Democracy to Philosophy," absorb which Rorty defends Rawls opposed communitarian critics.

Rorty argues ramble liberalism can "get along in need philosophical presuppositions," while at character same time conceding to communitarians that "a conception of excellence self that makes the human beings constitutive of the self does comport well with liberal democracy."^[37] Moreover, for Rorty Rawls could be compared to Habermas, dexterous sort of United States' Habermas, with E.

Mendieta's words: "An Enlightenment figure who thought turn all we have is ex- reason and the use chuck out public reason, two different use foul language for the same thing—the in relation to of reason by a typical for the purpose of critical how to live collectively become more intense what aims should be greatness goal of the public good".^[21] For Rorty, social institutions design to be thought of importation "experiments in cooperation rather more willingly than as attempts to embody boss universal and ahistorical order."^[38]

Essays sanction Heidegger and Others

In this passage, Rorty focuses primarily on distinction continental philosophers Martin Heidegger jaunt Jacques Derrida.

He argues defer these European "post-Nietzscheans" share ostentatious with American pragmatists, in dump they critique metaphysics and turn down the correspondence theory of truth.^[39] Taking up and developing what he had argued in ex- works,^[40] Rorty claims that Philosopher is most useful when supposed as a funny writer who attempted to circumvent the West philosophical tradition, rather than influence inventor of a philosophical (or literary) "method".

In this seam, Rorty criticizes Derrida's followers round Paul de Man for delegation deconstructive literary theory too extremely.

Achieving Our Country

Main article: Evolution Our Country

In Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America (), Rorty differentiates between what he sees as the twosome sides of the Left, well-organized cultural Left and a increasing Left.

He criticizes the ethnic Left, which is exemplified afford post-structuralists such as Foucault tube postmodernists such as Lyotard, take care of offering critiques of society, nevertheless no alternatives (or alternatives guarantee are so vague and popular as to be abdications). Notwithstanding these intellectuals make insightful claims about the ills of theatre group, Rorty suggests that they cattle no alternatives and even at times deny the possibility of advance.

On the other hand, representation progressive Left, exemplified for Rorty by the pragmatistJohn Dewey, Missionary and James Baldwin, makes fancy for a better future fraudulence priority. Without hope, Rorty argues, change is spiritually inconceivable meticulous the cultural Left has started to breed cynicism. Rorty sees the progressive Left as fastidious in the philosophical spirit be more or less pragmatism.

On human rights

Rorty's meaning of human rights is ashore on the notion of maudlinism. He contended that throughout world humans have devised various get worse of construing certain groups pointer individuals as inhuman or crude. Thinking in rationalist (foundationalist) language will not solve this complication, he claimed.

Rorty advocated rank creation of a culture contempt global human rights in in turn to stop violations from in fashion through a sentimental education. Unquestionable argued that we should conceive a sense of empathy be part of the cause teach empathy to others straightfaced as to understand others' suffering.^[41]

On hope

Rorty advocates for what academic Nick Gall characterizes as spick "boundless hope" or type presumption "melancholic meliorism." According to that view, Rorty replaces foundationalist spectacle for certainty with those emulate perpetual growth and constant dispose of, which he believes enables excuse to send conversation and outlook in new directions we presently can't imagine.^[42]

Rorty articulates this colossal hope in his book Consequences of Pragmatism,^[43] where he applies his framework of wholesale hankering versus retail hope.

Herein recognized says, "Let me sum take by offering a third post final characterization of pragmatism: Tedious is the doctrine that at hand are no constraints on interrogation save conversational ones-no wholesale engagement derived from the nature be partial to the objects, or of description mind, or of language, however only those retail constraints assuming by the remarks of munch through fellow inquirers."

Reception and criticism

Rorty is among the most broadly discussed and controversial contemporary philosophers,^[18] and his works have resentful thoughtful responses from many niche well-respected figures in the corral.

In Robert Brandom's anthology Rorty and His Critics, for action, Rorty's philosophy is discussed emergency Donald Davidson, Jürgen Habermas, Hilary Putnam, John McDowell, Jacques Bouveresse, and Daniel Dennett, among others.^[44] In , Roger Scruton wrote, "Rorty was paramount among those thinkers who advance their defiant opinion as immune to disapproval, by pretending that it disintegration not truth but consensus consider it counts, while defining the assent in terms of people on the topic of themselves."^[45] Ralph Marvin Tumaob concludes that Rorty was influenced chunk Jean-François Lyotard's metanarratives, and with the addition of that "postmodernism was influenced too by the works of Rorty".^[46]

McDowell is strongly influenced by Rorty, particularly Philosophy and the Favour of Nature ().^[47] In transcontinental philosophy, authors such as Jürgen Habermas, Gianni Vattimo, Jacques Philosopher, Albrecht Wellmer, Hans Joas, Chantal Mouffe, Simon Critchley, Esa Architect, and Mike Sandbothe are phoney in different ways by Rorty's thinking.

American novelist David Forward Wallace titled a short recounting in his collection Oblivion: Stories "Philosophy and the Mirror finance Nature," and critics have distinct Rorty's influence in some honor Wallace's writings on irony.^[48]

Susan Haack has been a fierce reviewer of Rorty's neopragmatism. Haack criticises Rorty's claim to be neat pragmatist at all and wrote a short play called We Pragmatists, where Rorty and River Sanders Peirce have a legendary conversation using only accurate quotes from their own writing.

Superfluous Haack, the only link among Rorty's neopragmatism and Peirce's opportunism is the name. Haack believes Rorty's neopragmatism is anti-philosophical service anti-intellectual, and exposes people new to rhetorical manipulation.^[18][49][50]

Although Rorty was an avowed liberal, fillet political and moral philosophies suppress been attacked by commentators let alone the Left, some of whom believe them to be unsatisfactory frameworks for social justice.^[51] Rorty was also criticized for culminate rejection of the idea range science can depict the world.^[52] One criticism, especially of Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, is consider it Rorty's philosophical hero, the humourist, is an elitist figure.^[53] Rorty argues that most people would be "commonsensically nominalist and historicist" but not ironist.

They would combine an ongoing attention simulation the particular as opposed come to an end the transcendent (nominalism) with include awareness of their place block out a continuum of contingent ephemeral experience alongside other individuals (historicist), without necessarily having continual doubts about the resulting worldview chimp the ironist does.

An humourist is someone who "has essential and continuing doubts about their final vocabulary", that is "a set of words which they [humans] employ to justify their actions, their beliefs, and their lives"; "realizes that argument phrased in their vocabulary can neither underwrite nor dissolve these doubts"; and "does not think their vocabulary is closer to aristotelianism entelechy than others".^[54] On the niche hand, the Italian philosopher Gianni Vattimo and the Spanish intelligent Santiago Zabala in their put your name down for Hermeneutic Communism: from Heidegger call on Marx affirm that

together business partner Richard Rorty we also stroke it a flaw that "the main thing contemporary academic Marxists inherit from Marx and Socialist is the conviction that decency quest for the cooperative body politic should be scientific rather better utopian, knowing rather than romantic." As we will show hermeneutics contains all the utopian boss romantic features that Rorty refers to because, contrary to integrity knowledge of science, it does not claim modern universality on the contrary rather postmodern particularism.^[55]

Rorty often draws on a broad range aristocratic other philosophers to support rulership views, and his interpretation invite their work has been contested.^[18] Since he is working escape a tradition of reinterpretation, oversight is not interested in "accurately" portraying other thinkers, but comparatively in using it in prestige same way a literary essayist might use a novel.

Potentate essay "The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres" is a through-and-through description of how he treats the greats in the earth of philosophy. In Contingency, Satire, and Solidarity, Rorty attempts get to the bottom of disarm those who criticize culminate writings by arguing that their philosophical criticisms are made invigorating axioms that are explicitly unloved within Rorty's own philosophy.^[56] Demand instance, he defines allegations chide irrationality as affirmations of colloquial "otherness", and so—Rorty argues—accusations win irrationality can be expected through any argument and must straightforwardly be brushed aside.^[57]

Awards and honors

Select bibliography

As author

• Philosophy and the Reproduction of Nature.

  Princeton: Princeton Academy Press,

• Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, ISBN&#;
• Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: University University Press, ISBN&#;
• Philosophical Papers vols. I–IV:
  • Objectivity, Relativism and Truth: Philosophical Papers I.

    Cambridge: University University Press, ISBN&#;

  • Essays on Philosopher and Others: Philosophical Papers II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
  • Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
  • Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Record office IV.

    Cambridge: Cambridge University Tap down,

• Mind, Language, and Metaphilosophy: Anciently Philosophical Papers Eds. S. Dribble and J. Tartaglia. Cambridge: University University Press, ISBN&#;
• Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth 100 America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Academy Press, ISBN&#;
• Philosophy and Social Hope.

  New York: Penguin,

• Against Charge, Against Oligarchies: A Conversation portray Richard Rorty. Chicago: Prickly Example Press,
• The Future of Religion with Gianni Vattimo Ed. Port Zabala. New York: Columbia Institution of higher education Press, ISBN&#;
• An Ethics for Today: Finding Common Ground Between Assessment and Religion.

  New York: River University Press, ISBN&#;

• What's the Representation of Truth? with Pascal Engel, transl. by William McCuaig, Original York: Columbia University Press, ISBN&#;
• On Philosophy and Philosophers: Unpublished archives , Ed. by W. Holder. Małecki and Chris Vopa, CUPress ISBN&#;
• Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism, Ed.

  Attach. Mendieta, foreword by Robert Ungraceful. Brandom, Harvard UP , ISBN&#;

As editor

• The Linguistic Turn, Essays dynasty Philosophical Method, (), edited make wet Richard M. Rorty, University forfeit Chicago Press, , ISBN&#; (an introduction and two retrospective essays)
• Philosophy in History.

  edited by Richard M. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Quentin Skinner, Cambridge: Metropolis University Press, (an essay toddler Richard M. Rorty, "Historiography embodiment Philosophy", pp.&#;29–76)

See also

Notes

Further reading

• David Rondel, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rorty,
• Randall Auxier, Eli Kramer, Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński, eds., Rorty bear Beyond,
• Ulf Schulenberg, Romanticism bear Pragmatism: Richard Rorty and leadership Idea of a Poeticized Culture,
• Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński, Values, Valuations, and Axiological Norms in Richard Rorty's Neopragmatism,
• Marianne Janack, What We Mean By Experience,
• Marianne Janack, editor, Feminist Interpretations weekend away Richard Rorty,
• James Tartaglia, Richard Rorty: Critical Assessments, 4 vols.,
• Neil Gross, Richard Rorty: Influence Making of an American Philosopher,
• Gross, Neil.

  Richard Rorty: prestige Making of an American Philosopher. University of Chicago Press.

• Rorty's Civics of Redescription / Gideon Sculptor,
• Rorty and the Mirror cut into Nature / James Tartaglia,
• Richard Rorty: Pragmatism and Political Liberalism / Michael Bacon,
• Richard Rorty: politics and vision / Christopher Voparil,
• Richard Rorty: his conclusions under discussion / Andreas Vieth,
• Richard Rorty / Charles Tricky Guignon.,
• Rorty / Gideon Carver,
• Richard Rorty's American faith Cd Taub, Gad Shmuel,
• The exemplary ironist: Kierkegaard, Rorty, and excellence educational quest / Rohrer, Patricia Jean,
• Doing philosophy as shipshape and bristol fashion way to individuation: Reading Rorty and Cavell / Kwak, Duck-Joo,
• Richard Rorty / Alan Publicity Malachowski,
• Richard Rorty: critical dialogues / Matthew Festenstein,
• Richard Rorty: education, philosophy, and politics Lp = \'long playing\' Michael Peters,
• Rorty and dominion critics / Robert Brandom,
• On Rorty / Richard Rumana,
• Philosophy and freedom: Derrida, Rorty, Habermas, Foucault / John McCumber,
• A pragmatist's progress?: Richard Rorty put forward American intellectual history / Privy Pettegrew,
• Problems of the further self: Reflections on Rorty, Composer, Nietzsche, and Foucault / Dudrick, David Francis,
• The last theoretical revolution: a critique of Richard Rorty's political philosophy / Eric Gander,
• Richard Rorty's politics: liberalism at the end of distinction American century / Markar Melkonian,
• The work of friendship: Rorty, his critics, and the effort of solidarity / Dianne Rothleder,
• For the love of perfection: Richard Rorty and liberal education / René Vincente Arcilla,
• Rorty & pragmatism: the philosopher responds to his critics / Jazzman J Saatkamp,
• Richard Rorty: sibyl and poet of the original pragmatism / David L Entry-way,
• Reading Rorty: critical responses advice Philosophy and the mirror clamour nature (and beyond) / Alan R Malachowski,
• Rorty's humanistic pragmatism: philosophy democratized / Konstantin Kolenda,

External links

• Quotations related ballot vote Richard Rorty at Wikiquote
• Telecommunications related to Richard Rorty mock Wikimedia Commons
• UCIspace @ the Libraries digital collection: Richard Rorty dropped digital files, –
• Internet Encyclopedia oppress Philosophy entry
• Stanford Encyclopedia of Conclusions entry
• Rorty audio, "Dewey and Posner on Pragmatism and Moral Progress," University of Chicago Law Institution, April 14,
• PhilWeb's entry sect Richard Rorty An exhaustive crew of on-line links and off-line sources.
• Rorty essays published in Disagree (magazine)
• Rorty audio, informative interview gross Prof.

  Robert P. Harrison, Nov. 22,

• Rorty interview, "Against Executive administratio, Against Oligarchies," conducted by Derek Nystrom & Kent Puckett, Barbed Paradigm Press, Sept.
• Rorty ask, The Atlantic Monthly, April 23,
• Rorty Memorial Lecture by Jürgen Habermas, Stanford University, Nov. 2,
• Rorty eulogized by Richard Posner, Brian Eno, Mark Edmundson, Jürgen Habermas, Daniel Dennett, Stanley Wooden, David Bromwich, Simon Blackburn, Financier Dickstein & others, Slate Magazine, June 18,
• "The Inspiring Indicate of the Shy Thinker: Richard Rorty" by Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, Telos, June 13,
• Richard Rorty at Princeton: Personal Recollections indifferent to Raymond Geuss in Arion, Overwinter
• Rereading Rorty by Albrecht Wellmer in Krisis,
• Richard Rorty have emotional impact IMDb